|
In
announcing Hewlett-Packard's $25 billion dollar merger
with Compaq, Carly Fiorina, H-P's chairwoman and CEO,
stated that the Compaq brand would go away. "H-P
will be the surviving brand" after the two companies
are merged.
This
decision has created quite a stir in the marketing and
advertising world, but we believe Ms. Fiorina made a
smart decision.
Merging
companies often use both brand names for a period of
time because of the perceived "equity" of
the brand in the marketplace. ExxonMobil and AOL Time
Warner are two recent examples. However, Compaq's brand
has been waning for some time now.
Compaq
CEO Mike Capellas has changed the company's strategy
three times in the last two years, ane never developed
a clear brand positioning. Nor did his predecessor Eckard
Pfeiffer. Rather, Compaq's strategy for several years
has been to promote lots of good products, matching
competitors' pricing and promising technology as good
as the likes of IBM and Apple. Offering good products
at comparable prices, however, is nothing uniqueit
has never given buyers a reason to choose Compaq over
other computer brands, especially since pc's and servers
are largely viewed as commodities.
A
recent study by Copernicus and Market Facts, "The
Commoditization of Brands and Its Implications for Marketers,"
found that none of the 51 product and service categories
studied are becoming more differentiated over time and
90 percent are declining in differentiation. As a result,
buyers are increasingly buying on price. The personal
computer category is no exception. Personal computers
scored right in the middle of the study, which means
that customers don't entirely buy on price alone; the
brand name still has some perceived value to the buyer,
but not much.
So H-P's decision to focus around the stronger of the
two brands is wise. Fiorina says the combined H-P will
spend as much on advertising as H-P and Compaq had spent
independently, which amounts to approximately $310 million
annually. The next critical move will be for H-P to
enhance its positioning to gives buyers a clearer reason
why they should choose H-P over the competitors. Savvy
targeting and positioning is only way to profitably
grow H-P, rescuing it from the looming snake pit of
an oversupplied and increasingly commoditized category.
Fortune's
Rankings of America's Most Admired Computer/Office Equipment
Manufacturers
|
2000
|
1999
|
Company
|
Score
|
|
1
|
4
|
Gateway
|
7.08
|
|
2
|
2
|
Sun
Micorsystems
|
6.79
|
|
3
|
5
|
Hewlett-Packard
|
6.41
|
|
4
|
3
|
International
Business Machines
|
6.20
|
|
5
|
1
|
Dell
Computer
|
6.07
|
|
6
|
8
|
Compaq
Computer
|
5.76
|
|
7
|
9
|
Canon
U.S.A.
|
4.81
|
|
8
|
6
|
Apple
Computer
|
4.60
|
|
9
|
10
|
NCR
|
4.54
|
|
10
|
7
|
Xerox
|
3.87
|
Source:
Fortune, "America's Most Admired," February
19, 2001
For
more insightful marketing discoveries, visit http://www.copernicusmarketing.com/discover/index.htm
Have
a hot discovery for our next release? Contact us at
ami.bowen@copernicusmarketing.com
Back
to top.
|